| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ROG

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 1148 Location: LEICESTER
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:30 am Post subject: WHY does a fleet trainer have to be an ADI ? |
|
|
This was an interesting comment and it got me thinking.........
| MGF wrote: | | It appears to me that some ADIs believe that no teaching of driving, whilst in a vehicle with the 'learner', should be undertaken by a non-registered person regardless of whether or not money changes hands. A bit like practicing surgery. |
WHY does a fleet trainer have to be an ADI ?
Can anyone explain please.............. _________________ ROG
Civilian Advanced Driver
Senior Observer
Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
UNEMPLOYED LGV instructor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daz6215
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 197 Location: Newcastle
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
mininum level of measured coaching/ teaching competence. Or any Tom Dick or Harrry would be telling your loved one's how to kill themselve's. _________________ ADI, DSA Fleet Registered Trainer,
RoADAR Dip,
RoSPA Gold,
LGV 1
http://www.northeastbespokedriving.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbsportstech

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 344 Location: Somerset
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
It may seem bonkers because the average adi's driving is only to dsa standard if that. Its not just the driving qualification they have proved they have a ability to teach and have sound knowledge of the highway code, but they are also crb checked and proved to have no record of sexual offences, fraud etc so it does make sense to me having an adi qualification.
Personally I think people who have other advanced driving qualifications such as rospa diploma should be able to get a licence much like a doorman so they they are aloud to teach full licence holders upwards. _________________ Regards James
Member of Southwest RoADAR
www.fordstownersclub.co.uk
To the average driver 'safe' is not having accidents. To an advanced driver 'safe' is not being vunerable to an accident. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScoobyChris
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 1258 Location: Andover, Hants
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jbsportstech wrote: | | Personally I think people who have other advanced driving qualifications such as rospa diploma should be able to get a licence much like a doorman so they they are aloud to teach full licence holders upwards. |
I like that idea a lot although I think the crunch point will come at the time they try and decide what advanced qualifications are acceptable and whether that influences what you can teach. Maybe there is scope for the DSA to create an AADI qualification
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StressedDave
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 641 Location: Cambridgeshire
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I was being flippant, the answer would be because the law says so Sure being an ADI means you have a proven teaching ability according to the competencies set out by the DSA and (now) you have proven not to have an unsuitable criminal convictions (although interestingly I'm not sure fraud is a bar to being an ADI - insert suitable joke here for your own amusement). But at then end of the day, ti comes down to the fact that the law says so - if you don't like the law then campaign for changes.
As for the comments on driving ability, does it really matter if the person providing instruction can't do what you do, purely from a learning point of view? Unless you subscribe to the monkey-see, monkey-do method of teaching, then you aren't necessarily going to learn much from a demonstration. If you've ever delved deeply into the DSA definition of driving, it's not that far away from what IAM/RoADAR members do up and down the country, merely that the level of competency required in delivery is potentially at a lower level because you can't expect IAM levels of perfection from a 17yr old with a hundred hours or so of practice.
Perhaps the question should be, how are you without an ADI going to prove that you are a fit and suitable person to provide fleet instruction to the public? Mere possession of a test pass is enough to enable you to become an observer - err, did anyone else see the conversation on here over the weekend with our slightly inflexible friend?
Perhaps a proper teaching certificate, combined with suitable documentary evidence of being occupationally competent in the subject you are proposing to teach? (For those interested that's a rough approximation of the assessor process for NVQs in the UK) If you think the latter, then the ADI sounds like a reasonable approximation to me, and those complaining are those who either feel the process is beneath them or have medical reasons why they can't get an ADI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daz6215
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 197 Location: Newcastle
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
or are incapable of passing it or unwilling to do it because they feel they perhaps have nothing else to learn themselve's? _________________ ADI, DSA Fleet Registered Trainer,
RoADAR Dip,
RoSPA Gold,
LGV 1
http://www.northeastbespokedriving.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crr003
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 1261 Location: Wirral
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| StressedDave wrote: | | Mere possession of a test pass is enough to enable you to become an observer.. |
There's a bit more to it than that.
Groups should run Observer courses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jont
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 925 Location: Bristol
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crr003 wrote: | | StressedDave wrote: | | Mere possession of a test pass is enough to enable you to become an observer.. |
There's a bit more to it than that.
Groups should run Observer courses. |
Ours do, but only for new observers and there's no retesting/training requirement other than maintaining your gold/silver pass every 3 years. I've had some interesting discussions about whether this is sufficient to provide an acceptable standard of observer, but it's traded off against people being volunteers and some not willing to be reassessed regularly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbsportstech

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 344 Location: Somerset
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Essentially I think it was created by the goverment to protect people from teachers who where not up to standard as we know most licence holders driving is far from good. Its goverment approval after alot of hoops that show you have some ability and your not a dangerous convicted criminal. It does stop any 'tom 'dick and 'harry' teaching driving instruction
I am sure at the time the fact that there are people with sound knowledge in advanced driving circles didn't come in the equation.
Do the IAM CRB check as rospa haven't asked to crb me? _________________ Regards James
Member of Southwest RoADAR
www.fordstownersclub.co.uk
To the average driver 'safe' is not having accidents. To an advanced driver 'safe' is not being vunerable to an accident. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daz6215
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 197 Location: Newcastle
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why do i need a pcv licence to drive a bus when i have c+e ? i know i can drive the bus, but in order to do so legally i need to follow the correct channels and obtain the correct qualification. I'm sure looking around at many jobs you may think i could do that! If you are really passionate and have the drive 'pardon the pun' then i'm sure nothing would get in your way. _________________ ADI, DSA Fleet Registered Trainer,
RoADAR Dip,
RoSPA Gold,
LGV 1
http://www.northeastbespokedriving.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zadocbrown
Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 147
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think what it boils down to is this: the number of people in the situation of having to qualify as ADIs, despite having no intention of teaching learners is relatively small. Too small, in the authorities' view, to make it worthwhile creating a seperate channel.
Many of the basic skills for part 3 come in useful teaching at higher levels. It's not entirely irrelevant.
I think there is also the view (which I share) that up to date knowledge of what and how learners are being taught is desirable for the well rounded driving coach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
michael769
Joined: 17 Sep 2007 Posts: 241 Location: Livingston
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| daz6215 wrote: | | Why do i need a pcv licence to drive a bus when i have c+e ? i know i can drive the bus, but in order to do so legally i need to follow the correct channels and obtain the correct qualification. I'm sure looking around at many jobs you may think i could do that! If you are really passionate and have the drive 'pardon the pun' then i'm sure nothing would get in your way. |
Oddly you do not need to have a PCV licence to drive a bus more than 25 years old, a car license is enough, as long as you do not carry more than eight people and it is not for hire and reward. Who says this has to make any sense
I think the reason is that the vast majority of drivers of such vehicles are doing so professionally carrying passengers. You can make the argument that a person who carries as many as 50 fee paying passengers should be subject to additional training over and above that required to carry 30+ tonnes of potatoes. You might think you can drive a bus but would you (without additional training) think to check if elderly and disabled passengers are moving about inside the bus and would you be able to correctly adjust you driving so that you avoid throwing them to the round when you pull up at traffic lights? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daz6215
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 197 Location: Newcastle
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| michael769 wrote: | | daz6215 wrote: | | Why do i need a pcv licence to drive a bus when i have c+e ? i know i can drive the bus, but in order to do so legally i need to follow the correct channels and obtain the correct qualification. I'm sure looking around at many jobs you may think i could do that! If you are really passionate and have the drive 'pardon the pun' then i'm sure nothing would get in your way. |
You might think you can drive a bus but would you (without additional training) think to check if elderly and disabled passengers are moving about inside the bus and would you be able to correctly adjust you driving so that you avoid throwing them to the round when you pull up at traffic lights? |
I was actually using that as an analogy, thats correct i might THINK i can drive the bus but have i taken everything else involved into account? the same goes with people who THINK that they can easily step into my shoes , have they taken a thought to everything else involved? i.e Additional training also!!! _________________ ADI, DSA Fleet Registered Trainer,
RoADAR Dip,
RoSPA Gold,
LGV 1
http://www.northeastbespokedriving.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jont
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 925 Location: Bristol
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| michael769 wrote: | | You can make the argument that a person who carries as many as 50 fee paying passengers should be subject to additional training over and above that required to carry 30+ tonnes of potatoes. You might think you can drive a bus but would you (without additional training) think to check if elderly and disabled passengers are moving about inside the bus and would you be able to correctly adjust you driving so that you avoid throwing them to the round when you pull up at traffic lights? |
You might think the operating companies would be required set timetables to allow you to take all that into consideration Does the test for PCV require consideration for that sort of thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Advanced Roadcraft
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 134 Location: Tring, Herts
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is NO driver training/instruction ("L" drivers, advanced, fleet,, off road, go-karts, race etc) that I know of that cannot legally be performed by a non-ADI.
But only ADIs, it appears, can charge for it. Don't think that there's been a test case but it would be interesting!
So the reason for the ADI requirement is obviously merely special pleading to ensure that their incomes are protected. Nothing to do with maintaining standards at all.
Best, B _________________ Best, B
Car: Saab 9.3 Coupe
Bikes: Honda Deauville; Suzuki Bugman 400 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|