| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Slink_Pink
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 36 Location: Herts
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:01 pm Post subject: Should know better? |
|
|
A friend of mine was considering advanced driver training, but was put off by the thought/rumour that if an advanced driver were to be, say, caught speeding, then the courts would be of the opinion that the advanced driver should know better and, as such, be more harsh in their punishment. There was also some mention of double-points! Does anyone wish to share their thoughts/experience on this? _________________ Need I remind you, 007, that you have a license to kill, not to break the traffic laws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TripleS
Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 2765 Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: Re: Should know better? |
|
|
| Slink_Pink wrote: | | A friend of mine was considering advanced driver training, but was put off by the thought/rumour that if an advanced driver were to be, say, caught speeding, then the courts would be of the opinion that the advanced driver should know better and, as such, be more harsh in their punishment. There was also some mention of double-points! Does anyone wish to share their thoughts/experience on this? |
I have no specific knowledge of how these things work, but what you describe doesn't sound likely to me, certainly not the double points bit.
Others may know better.
Best wishes all,
Dave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScoobyChris
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 1256 Location: Andover, Hants
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:25 pm Post subject: Re: Should know better? |
|
|
| Slink_Pink wrote: | | Does anyone wish to share their thoughts/experience on this? |
Don't speed?
More seriously, they'll not know he's an advanced driver and nor will they care, imho, unless he tries to use it as a defence.
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Porker
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Essex
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They wouldn't know that a defendant had taken any further training. It's not recorded by DVLA or anything like that.
There's no provision for handing out harsher penalties (in terms of fine, points or anything else) for anyone that's taken further training either.
The one possible exception to this is if someone tried to use the fact that they'd taken further training as justification (or mitigation) for an offence. For example, "It was OK for me to drive on that motorway at 90mph because I'm a member of the IAM." That might land you with a harsher sentence depending on the mood of the bench.
It might however be useful if you were trying to defend yourself against a "momentary lapse", in which case you might suggest that you're normally very careful - even to the extent of taking additional training to make you safer - but that that one particular incident was completely out of character.
regards
P. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ROG

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 1148 Location: LEICESTER
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I remember a case where a Police Traffic driver when off duty was before a court for speeding (before NIPS) and was treated no differently than any other member of the driving public - and yes, the court did know what his job was. _________________ ROG
Civilian Advanced Driver
Senior Observer
Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
UNEMPLOYED LGV instructor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ewan
Joined: 13 Nov 2008 Posts: 5 Location: UK
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fear that one might be more harshly treated for being more responsible and more highly trained goes against common sense so I can't believe for one moment that the law would view an advanced driver as anything other than more responsible than most other drivers notwithstanding there might be an occasional lapse (eg your speeding offence scenario). Also, one of the basic tenets UK law is that ignorance is no defence. It automatically follows therefore that all drivers are treated as though they are aware of the law, not just advanced drivers. As Mr Bumble in Charles Dickens' "Oliver Twist" said "The law is an ass".
But surely it can't be that much of an ass. _________________ Ewan
MiDAS Training for Minibus Drivers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|