| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stefan einz

Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Posts: 146
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: Avoiding rear wheel lock up |
|
|
We've chatted before on this forum about the benefits of matching revs on downchanges, particularly in the context of powerful rear wheel drive cars where, in extremis, one can experience rear wheel lock up and a consequent loss of control.
On other forums (not ones as enlightened as this, naturally!), people have been known to state that surely this whole risk of rear wheel lock up is overdone.
Well, I came across an interesting section from the Porsche Carrera GT workshop briefing manual. It reads as follows:
"Engine drag torque control (MSR)
Within the TC function there exists also engine drag torque control. This may be required for instance after changing down to a lower gear on slippery ground. On changing down to a lower gear the resulting engine braking effect can be so severe as to fracture the rear axle. MSR prevents this by calling for power (giving gas) through the engine management system. There is always the possibility that the Carrera GT driver may switch off the traction control functions by pressing the button labelled “TC”. He is then reminded of this by the display “TC off” in the multi-function instrument.
It is however inadvisable to switch off the TC functions. Doing so will in any case not lead to better lap times on the race track."
Extract, Porsche Carrera GT workshop manual
I have marked in bold the sentence which makes the point quite well!
(I also rather like the last sentence.)
This system does not, in fact, blip the throttle (as with F1 type systems; this is a traditional manual gearbox car), but clearly the software is clever enough to detect when the torque through the drive train due to a poor downshift is too high, and compensate accordingly. (Such systems are common on powerful motorbikes.)
So, I think this provides good evidence to rebut the doubters!
Kind regards
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StressedDave
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 532 Location: Cambridgeshire
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My former Fabia vRS also had MSR - it's about the only thing it did have in common with the CGT... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TripleS
Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 2249 Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I may have been guilty of dismissing this problem to some extent. My view was that anybody driving a powerful car has no business being clumsy enough to provoke this sort of problem anyhow.
Sorry for any upset I may have caused, but I accept it could be a serious problem.
Best wishes all,
Dave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefan einz

Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Posts: 146
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TripleS wrote: | I think I may have been guilty of dismissing this problem to some extent. My view was that anybody driving a powerful car has no business being clumsy enough to provoke this sort of problem anyhow.
Sorry for any upset I may have caused, but I accept it could be a serious problem.
Best wishes all,
Dave. |
Dave
No apology needed, none at all!
I quite agree that anyone driving a powerful car has an obligation to understand the challenges and risks - sadly, all too few owners of such cars do.
What amazed me is that the fact that not only could a loss of grip be caused, but that components could break!
Kind regards
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TripleS
Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 2249 Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Steve,
The loss of grip is easy to envisage if a low gear is suddenly engaged at a brisk road speed, but I would have said an actual component breakage ought not to happen.
Best wishes all,
Dave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martine
Joined: 17 Oct 2005 Posts: 1267 Location: Bristol, UK
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TripleS wrote: | | The loss of grip is easy to envisage if a low gear is suddenly engaged at a brisk road speed, but I would have said an actual component breakage ought not to happen. |
Yes I find this quite surprising (not that I'm doubting it)...bit scary that a 'fluffed' gear change could cause many thousands of £ damage.
Interesting their suggestion that turning off the TC increases lap times...do you reckon that's true with a skilled driver? I have conflicting reasons for asking (but schizo!)...F1 used TC until this year and yet there are plenty of non-advanced road drivers who turn it off claiming it gets in the way.
Yours confused (both of me!).  _________________ Martin - Bristol IAM Group Senior Observer and Secretary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefan einz

Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Posts: 146
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TripleS wrote: | Hello Steve,
The loss of grip is easy to envisage if a low gear is suddenly engaged at a brisk road speed, but I would have said an actual component breakage ought not to happen.
Best wishes all,
Dave. |
Indeed. If I had not read this in the official CGT workshop manual, I might have struggled to believe it myself.
I suspect the point here is, however, that, from a design perspective, fitting a electronic overlord to avoid a component being damaged in extremis is a far lighter alternative to over engineering a component (and thereby making it unnecessarily heavy for 99.9% of the time). The CGT was designed with very high power and light weight in mind, so I am fairly sure that the design choices will have been dictated by that. In short, this will have been a conscious choice.
Kind regards
Steve
Last edited by stefan einz on Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefan einz

Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Posts: 146
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| martine wrote: | | TripleS wrote: | | The loss of grip is easy to envisage if a low gear is suddenly engaged at a brisk road speed, but I would have said an actual component breakage ought not to happen. |
Yes I find this quite surprising (not that I'm doubting it)...bit scary that a 'fluffed' gear change could cause many thousands of £ damage.
Interesting their suggestion that turning off the TC increases lap times...do you reckon that's true with a skilled driver? I have conflicting reasons for asking (but schizo!)...F1 used TC until this year and yet there are plenty of non-advanced road drivers who turn it off claiming it gets in the way.
Yours confused (both of me!).  |
See my response to Dave re the component damage.
Regarding TC, Walter Rohrl, who played a major role in the development of the CGT, is the man quoted as saying that he is no faster with the TC switched off. The TC on the CGT is quite straightforward. It operates by either braking a rear wheel and / or removing power from the engine. It is not a full stability control system (ie, it only acts when the rear wheels are losing grip).
I have driven the car in anger, and been driven in it by a far more skilled friend, and the TC, as benefits a car of this sort, is tuned for performance. It comes in very late, and is really designed to avoid the car getting too far out of shape. Because the car has an ultra low polar moment of inertia, it spins very quickly indeed - again, Rohrl is quoted as saying that once it has gone, it has gone - and that from the great man himself.
So, for the CGT, I am happy to believe the great man and leave the TC on at all times.
That said, I have driven the car on the MIRA wet grips with TC switched off, and it was very easy to balance. But this is at low speed and is all very predictable. Not at all the same as being flat out down the Foxhole!
In contrast, I can comment that my old E39 M5, as an example of a more typical high performance road car, had a highly instrusive TC system, that intervened too early and for too long. Rapid progress on track was impossible without turning the system off.
So, I think the answer is that it all depends on the car and set up. It is evident just from watching the Australian Grand Prix that all the drivers were finding this year's cars without TC a handful. Last year's cars' TC systems were no doubt tuned to perfection to allow maximum cornering speed and traction. It is doubtful a human brain can do better. But for normal road cars where the purpose of TC is safety not speed, the system is frequently an impediment to the fastest lap time. The CGT is probably in the middle of these two extremes.
Kind regards
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hardboiled
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 199
Direct link for this post
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I know it's not a car but I was interested to spot that the 2008 model Honda Fireblade now has a slipper-clutch fitted as standard to assist with rear wheel lockups. It's a common device on racing machines but this is the first time that Honda has fitted one to it's standard production line bikes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|